About Me

Name: Redhead
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Modern Corporate Warfare

Thomas Edison was an @$$hole.

Thomas Edison may go down in history as a great inventor and benefactor of mankind. But the truth was he engaged in rather shady business and marketing practices, was accused on many counts of stealing others patents and inventions, and was only interested in how the inventions would benefit him. He apparently can also lay claim to the End User License Agreement as well. And he said that his favorite film was “The Birth of a Nation.”

Edison’s work and company depended on Direct Current. They often competed with the idea of Alternating Current put forth by others. In his marketing for DC, Edison became involved in the development of an electric chair. Using AC, of course, to demonstrate its deadly effects. He also publically electrocuted Topsy the Elephant using Alternating Current in a now familiar use of scare tactics to discourage people from using the rival standard.

In 1884, Edison employed one Nikola Tesla with the promise that if he made improvements to his Direct Current generation plants, Edison would pay him $50,000. When Tesla succeeded and asked for payment (over $1,000,000 at today’s rates) Edison refused, telling the immigrant, “When you become a full-fledged American you will appreciate an American joke.” Tesla quit.

Tesla eventually went to work for George Westinghouse. There he continued his work on Alternating Currents and helped Westinghouse to eventually win the contract to light the 1893 World’s Fair. This was to mark the triumph of Alternating Current of Westinghouse over the Direct Current of Edison.

In the 1980’s and 1990’s Westinghouse sold off most of its electrical and manufacturing assets. All that remains of Westinghouse is CBS. Yes, that CBS. There is a small division – the Westinghouse Electric Company which basically just maintains the licenses of Westinghouse and sells them to other companies.

Edison’s Edison Electric Company eventually became Edison General Electric and later merged with another company to become just General Electric. And that brings us to today.

Around the start of this millennium GE began seeing the green within the green movement. They made over 6 Billion (!) dollars from their Ecomagination lines in 2004. They should have easily doubled that by today. And now they can qualify for government subsidies under the Cash for Appliances Program.

Today GE is using the power of the government to beat any other rivals. In only the last few months they have been very busy. Of course this should come as little surprise to anyone who was watching because the current CEO, Jeff Immelt is also on Obama’s Economic Recovery Board. The foxes are guarding the henhouse. Why was Bush ridiculed for having Energy Companies weigh in on Energy Policy?

GE is also part of the United States Climate Action Partnership, a group of “businesses and leading environmental organizations that have come together to call on the federal government to quickly enact strong national legislation to require significant reductions of greenhouse gas emissions.” And yes, GE is also part of Al Gore’s Generation Investment Management fund. Oh yeah, did I mention that GE has started up its own Environmental Offset division?

Of course, the GE ties to the current administration and their quest to use the government to their advantage doesn’t stop there.

GE owns - lock, stock, and barrel (is that racist?) - MSNBC. The secret behind MSNBC’s liberal bias is well known and well documented. This link should come as little surprise to those of you who have read this far.

It should also come as no surprise that Immelt has spoken out supporting the many Obama pronouncements, no matter how farfetched.

GE has also gotten themselves qualified as a bank under their GE Finance arm. This means they managed to get some of those Bank Bailout funds. They qualified as a bank, without having to meet some of the other restrictions as a bank. How? Only this administration knows.

So what’s next? How about GE’s new Healthymagination line? GE stands to make B-B-Billions off of healthcare legislation. It’s seems wherever you turn lately, there’s GE. How could they know? Oh, yeah, Immelt is on the Economic Recovery Board.

Oh, and just out last month, GE is getting a personal introduction by Obama to Russia. It truly is WHO you know!

Now, let me just close up by saying that I am a fan of science fiction, especially the Cyberpunk genre. In this genre, the idea of corporations having actual Warfare against each other is fairly common, complete with spies, armies, kidnappings, and assassins. I would prefer that kind of world. But why go to all that trouble when you can just get yourself a government agent to act for you?

Most liberals would read this and say, “That’s the trouble with Big Corporations! They need to be regulated better!”

This Conservative says: That’s the trouble with having Big Government! If the politicians didn’t have this kind of power, there would be much less Corporate influence in our politics. The government needs to be regulated better!

You shouldn’t speak ill of the dead,

but Thomas Edison was an @$$hole.

Tags: GE   obama  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barrack Obama is the Best thing to happen to America!

No, Really!
 
First, his campaign supposedly excited a lot of people. These people may be paying attention to politics for the first time. This really is a good thing. The more people actively paying attention, the less the politicians can get away with.

Second, people on the right side of the aisle are starting to become vocal. We now have rallies regularly in many cities. We have the formation of the Tea Party Nation. We have people speaking out and taking action like never before. People are waking up.

People are also beginning to take notice of the inconsistencies and downright false hoods of the liberals in Congress and the Obama administration. Even Helen Thomas woke up to question the Obama Team, calling their control of the media “Shocking.” They are being sued by the same people who sued the Bush administration for visitor logs. The AP let an article through that questioned Obama’s commitment to his campaign pledges.

The numbers from the “Stimulus” bill are not showing up, and people are starting to notice. The discussions about how flawed this legislation was are getting input from both sides of the divide. The paybacks within this bill are coming to light as the deficit grows. And people are awakening.

The growing deficit has also caused some to wake up. Those that railed against Bush for deficit spending are probably beginning to look back to the “good old days.” The ones that are not should be getting very uncomfortable having to defend this administration. The Chinese (!) have even begun questioning the deficit spending.

The Obama Care bills are starting to get flack, from within the President’s own party! Some of the more conservative less liberal Democrats say that they are trying to “save the party..” The President and his liberal wing know that the longer it takes, the more people will awaken, and the less likely it will survive, so they are pushing hard to get it passed as quickly as possible, as they have with every other bill. The heavy handedness of this administration toward legislators is growing troubling, even to some within the party.

The numbers are proving all of this as well. Obama’s negatives are increasing. His viewership is down. He has managed to stir up race relations in this Post-Racial World, much to the chagrin of Bill Cosby, by criticizing the police academy expert on racial profiling. Nancy Pelosi’s numbers are falling down as well, as people awaken and realize she is not trust worthy, and they wish she could be put to sleep. Democrat governors are also taking a hit. The liberal governor of California is starting to make sense. Some liberals still do not get it, but some are waking up. 

One other really encouraging thing is this poll which shows the number of self-described Conservatives is increasing!

Does anyone really think things would have been any better if McCain had won? If so you’re kidding yourself. The good news is that at this point, all the Republicans have to do is keep their mouths shut and their pants zipped, and they are a shoo-in for 2010. Or, they could wake up and actually start speaking up for the Conservative position on things, and stand by the Constitution and Freedom, and they could ensure victory in 2010 AND 2012, but if they put up another McWannabe, I’m voting for someone else. Again.

I’m holding my breath…

Wake me / revive me next year in time to vote.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (11) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Latest Plan

I’ve been inspired by Gray Ghost and his latest post.

It's time to bring out the Principia Discordia! Prepare yourselves! This should now be a must read for the Conservative Movement in America. These should also be on your Must Read list! The Illuminatus! Trilogy and Schrodinger’s Cat Trilogy.

I hereby propose a system of individual actions from every one of you! It’s time to use some of their same tactics against them. Stop being part of the problem! Let your voice be heard! Armed with this information, you should be ready to follow through. Some of my favorite ideas include:

Signs:
 
1.     Place signs and placards around your business, readily accessible to customers, such as:
a.     “Sorry for the mess. I had to choose between employees to lay off so that I could increase the wages for the others to meet new federal guidelines. The guy that did the cleaning got the boot.”
b.     “We apologize for the lack of service. We were unionized under the card check bill and can’t get good help anymore.”
c.     “Prices are high due to the increased cost of doing business under increasing federal oversight. We apologize for the inconvenience. Politics has consequences.”

2.    
If you are in danger of going out of business, these signs may be appropriate:
a.     “We are going out of business. We cannot afford to pay increased taxes and test all of our products for lead.”
b.     “We did not receive any federal bailout money and are going out of business. This is what happens when the government intervenes. See you at Wal-Mart.”
c.     “I am taking my money are going while the going is good. See you in Galt’s Gulch!”

3.    
Just for fun:
a.     Change signs currently in place. This can be a change to something political, or just plain non-sense. The goal here is just to create confusion and distrust and to have fun, rather than as a political statement.
b.     In The Illuminatus Trilogy, the midget Chaney replaced signs. One of my favorites was:

NO SALESPERSON MAY LEAVE THE FLOOR OR GO TO THE DOOR WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF A SUPERIOR.

THE MGT.


4.    
Put up a flag, as proposed by Edna Eagle.

Bankrupt the System:


1.    
Apply for every federally funded program you can! Even if you don’t qualify, flood them with applications.

2.    
Change your tax withholdings to Married with 9 Dependents. You may have to pay in next year, so sock some back. Wait until the last minute to file your taxes next year. This will at least keep the quarterly income to the Treasury down, and should get someone’s attention.

3.    
Sell your Treasury holdings. Even if you have to take a loss on your bonds, go ahead and sell them now. Force them to pay back part of their debt. Move your 401K’s and other accounts out of government bonds. Do not voluntarily fund any part of this debacle.

Other:


1.    
My favorite (largely because I thought of it): Write and e-mail your Congress Critters and demand that they introduce The Gun Ownership Training and Certified Handling for America Program.

2.    
Again, as proposed by Gray Ghost, get your stamps. You can get them here.

3.    
Drop any membership in any organization that backs this current administration or its goals in any way. Whether it is AARP, The Sierra Club, or whatever, let them know by withdrawing your membership. Enlist in other organizations that are dedicated to freedom.

4.    
The next time you see PETA planning to protest in your city, take a day off and set up a grill next to them. Give away free steaks, shish-ka-bobs, or lamb chops. Make a bet with them on who gets the most customers.
 
Tags: discordia  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (11) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Union Dues


I know this is off-topic, but I haven’t had much chance to continue my series lately, due to an increased work load, at home and at work. But given the current atmosphere and the growing influence of the unions in America, from the automakers UAW bailout, to the card check bill, to the current trespassing of union workers in Chicago, I thought I would take a minute to tell of my own union experiences. If you bothered to read my bio, you would know that at one time I was a member of a union, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.

I first entered the union as an apprentice shortly after getting out of the Navy. I was an electrician’s mate in the Navy, and since I needed to work to support myself, I agreed to join the local union and go through their training.

The first thing that I noticed upon joining was that I was asked several times during the application process if I had any relatives in the union. No, I do not. Normally, this would have served to keep me out, but given my high test scores due to my Navy training, and the fact that membership was turning down at this time, they couldn’t come up with any reason to stop me from joining. (If they knew what they were getting, they probably would have tried to stop me anyway.) Ordinarily, this question is used as a sort of “affirmative action” requirement and has been used in the past to keep out blacks and other undesirables. This was confirmed by more than one union member later. The class that I started in also noticeably had the largest percentage of black members of any previous class. There was no small amount of grumbling over this fact within the workforce. This was in the late 1990’s.

Many of the lessons in the first two years of training (You must serve a five year apprenticeship in the IBEW and attend classes.) dealt with Union history and purpose. Propaganda. As luck would have it, my class also contained a couple of others who were not fond of the propaganda role being played here (again, due to the relaxed membership rules) and so we would openly call it as we saw it in class. This did not make us too many friends. We were clearly Conservatives.

On one of my first jobs, I was working with a lifelong union member when 9:00 came around. At that point I was working up on a ladder to mount a junction box in the ceiling for some conduit. I had one screw in place, when my journeyman tells me its break time. I tell him I’ll be done in just a second. He starts yelling, “Its break time now! Get down here and take your break!” This was new to me. In the Navy we took a break when the job was finished, not by the clock. Welcome to Civilian Life!

A few of the members of my class had union Daddy’s, Grand-daddy’s, Uncles, and the like. These guys got placed with the biggest shops, and typically stayed there throughout their apprenticeship. One of my classmates is still with the same shop he started with his first day. I got placed with a small shop which needed some temporary help on a job that was a little bigger than they were used to. After the job was through, I was kept for a short time, and was used on several small jobs, often side by side with the boss. This kind of experience is what they didn’t count on when they placed me there, I think. Alas, work got too slow for the boss to justify keeping even one little apprentice, and because I wasn’t always there when he called, I got laid off. (It got to the point where he told me to stay home and he would call me. Then one Thursday morning, I told him I couldn’t make it due to Whiskey Wednesday at the Bayou the night before. I was laid off shortly afterward…)

Shortly after this, I found myself with one of the larger contractors in town at a job in a paper mill. You get used to the smell. Many of these guys were long time union hands, and had relatives in the union. The real hard nosing began.

It didn’t take long before politics came up with this bunch. This was in 1996, and Clinton was running for re-election against Bob Dole. It took less time for many of the journeymen to figure out that I was a Republican. This is when things got fun.

I got threatened. I got pushed. I was given the dirtiest jobs. I was yelled at for the most minor grievances and called every name in the book, no matter how small or imaginary the foul. It was boot camp all over again. But I had been through boot camp, and survived. I would survive this. And I did, for over a year. I was told that I should “vote my pocketbook.” I said that I was. I was voting for lower taxes. I told them that one day I intended to have more than this life. I was looked at with disbelief. I was laughed at. I was told I was being stupid.

Then many of the same folks figured out that I intended to go back to school after completing my apprenticeship. I was already attending a few night classes. For some reason this did not go over much better. I was told that I was “stupid” for wanting to go back to school. Why would I want to be an engineer when I had union security? After all, we (union hands) had everything! We could come and go as we pleased. If we didn’t like the job or the boss, we could quit, go back to the hall, and get another call. We made good money. (The journeyman did, anyway. I was working a second job delivering pizzas.) We had good benefits. (That part at least was true. I have held onto my meager pension, and the medical insurance was pretty good.)

So amongst all of this, I was working with a particular strong union believer one day, when it came break time. So, naturally at 8:45 we started preparing for break. This is a process, you know. At 9:30 we were still sitting in the work shack after the other guys had left. I turn to my journeyman:

“Breaks over, man. Let’s get back to work.”
Union Journeyman: “I’m not ready yet. Just sit still.”
Me: “We’re costing the company money. This job shouldn’t take that much longer.”
UJ: “I don’t care. I’ll work when I feel like it.”
At this point he’s getting a little tense. He knows my political leanings and that I don’t always shut up when I’m supposed to.
Me: (Pushing it…) “If we don’t finish this job, the shutdown may run over. There are other guys waiting on us.”
UJ: (Angry) “I don’t give a d@mn! I don’t care if the shutdown goes six months over!”
Me: (Really Pushing it…) “If this shutdown goes over, they’re likely to shut the whole plant down. What will you do then?”
UJ: “I don’t care shut this whole plant down, I’ll go to the next one!”
Me: …

I don’t know if that particular plant is still working, but chances are if you need some electrical work done, you can go down to the Union Hall and find that particular journeyman electrician. He’ll be sitting in the back, playing cards with his buddies, waiting on the next call to come in and complaining about how George Bush and his buddies sent all of the jobs overseas, just so that they could make a buck, and how they screwed over the working man. A few minutes later one of them will laugh because those evil executives at the paper mill are out on their arses and can’t find another job in town…
 
Tags: unions  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (17) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

God gave us our Rights, Government can only take them away.


This is the first part of the series on “
Why I’m an Unapologetic Conservative”. You may see the rest of the proposed series titles here.

God gave us Free Will. It is through government interference that others seek to take that away. It is no accident that Karl Marx sought to remove God from the people. Karl Marx said that all religion must be subjugated, and referred to religion as the “opium of the masses.” In the end, liberalism must rely on people taking the word of their government benefactors over the word of our God.

God given rights include, in the words of our founders, the rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of happiness. The fact the we derive, or receive, these rights from God is very important. If we do not receive these rights from God, where do they come from?

A Liberal Atheist might say that our rights come from the government. But if that is so, then what is to stop the government from taking them away? Does the ex-patriot without a country have no rights? Did the Jews in Germany stop having any rights to their lives because the National Socialist government decided to take them away?

A Conservative Atheist might say that our rights are self derived, or that they are self evident. But if that is so, then do the mentally deranged have any rights? Does the person who wishes to kill himself give up his Right to Life? Does someone with Multiple Personality Disorder with one depressed personality give up the right to Pursue happiness for the other personalities? What if they change their minds?

The first Right guaranteed by God is the Right to Life. This should include the unborn, as well as the elderly. This also is not a blanket refusal of the death penalty. I said that governments take our rights away. If you deprive another of their rights, then you should lose yours. This also does not obligate anyone else to do anything to extend your right to life. To advocate this would lead to an abrogation of the Right to Liberty.

The Right to Liberty includes the right to live your life as you see fit. Thus, if you choose to work 20 hours a day, seven days a week in pursuit of money, then you have that right. If you choose instead to live the life of the urban outdoorsman, then you may also do that. This does not obligate anyone else to aid you, however. Seeking someone else’s aid through government intervention and force is a refusal to recognize their rights to liberty.

Notice, in the listing of our rights, I did not capitalize the word happiness, but instead chose to Capitalize Pursuit. This is an important distinction. We are given the right to TRY to be happy, through whatever means we wish to employ, so long as that pursuit does not infringe on the rights of others. Whether or not we succeed is entirely left up to us. If we were afforded the right to BE happy, the drug war would probably look a lot different, and these guys would be kings!

The government encroaches on these rights through the only means available to it. Force. Any other means are simply an attempt to disguise the use of force. Why do you pay taxes? To do your patriotic duty? No! So that men in black suits with black rifles won’t come pounding down your door, throw you to the ground, and put you in jail for a long time! Why do you put on a helmet whenever you drive a motorcycle? To have really cool hair when you take it off? No!  So that men in blue suits with black guns won’t stop you and threaten to come pounding down your door, throw you to the ground, and put you in jail for a long time if you don’t give them money!

By contrast, think of it this way. Why do you pay your telephone bill? To stop guys in black suits from pointing guns at you? No! So that you can continue to use your telephone to call those nice ladies with the 900 numbers. Why do you buy stuff at Wal-Mart? To stop guys in black suits from pointing guns at you? No! So that you can continue to get your daily allowance of lead from those nice people in China really cheap.

John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the United States, in Federalist Papers No. 2, stated that: "Nothing is more certain than the indispensable necessity of Government, and it is equally undeniable, that whenever and however it is instituted, the people must cede to it some of their natural rights, in order to vest it with requisite powers." It is something to consider. How many of your God given rights are you willing to cede to the Government?
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (27) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why I’m an Unapologetic Conservative

 

I first started writing this before much of the craziness that led to an Obama Coronation. Some of my thoughts since then have changed, not so much in intent, but in focus. I believe, now, more than ever, that as Conservatives, we should be letting others know Why Conservatism. The Conservative philosophy is Right, not just because it leads to a better life for those that live by it, but because it ultimately leads to Life, Liberty, and Happiness for the Nation that practices it. Conservatism is an optimistic philosophy, and we have forgotten that. We have gotten wrapped up in the He Said / She Said of politics. We have reacted to the tactics of the left of placing the blame elsewhere, instead of acting to ensure that the reasons behind our policies are best for the Country. We have abandoned our core beliefs for the minutiae of individual policies, and we have allowed ourselves to become fragmented, not just among ourselves, and what should be our Party, but from the rest of the country. It is time to reclaim both. Others have outlined some very good plans, and they may work. But I believe that for Conservatism to work, and for Conservatives to regain the Country, we must get back down to basics.
 
My basics are outlined below. In addition to the brief explanation following, I plan on a post on each topic, expounding on each of them. These are also subject to change. It is highly likely that I will add to them as I see fit, or as others suggest more topics, or just to make it a nice even 10 topics (like occurred to my previous series, Liberal Logic). Stay tuned!
 
God gave us Free Will. It is through government interference that others seek to take that away. It no accident that Karl Marx sought to remove God from the people. Karl Marx said that all religion must be subjugated, and referred to religion as the “opium of the masses.” In the end, liberalism must rely on people taking the word of their government benefactors over the word of our God.

2.    I believe in America, the Home of the Free, and the Land of the Brave.

We live in the Greatest Nation on Earth. This Country has repeatedly sent our people out to fight against oppression, against tyranny, in order to promote freedom. We have led the world in one endeavor after another. In just 200 short years we have become the greatest, most powerful, richest nation on the planet. Unless I missed the CNN story, people are not swimming to Communist Cuba in order to get away from the “injustices” of the United States.

3.    I believe in the good in people.

Some have said that the difference between Conservatives and Liberals is that Conservatives are pessimists, and believe that all people are evil at heart, while Liberals believe that everyone is good at heart. I disagree. I believe that people are inherently good. There are some who turn away from this goodness, and therefore away from God, in order to do evil in the world.

4.    I believe in Limited government because I want Individual Freedom.

If Government can only take our Rights away, then as government grows it must, by definition, become more oppressive. The government of a country derives its power from the people of that country. Additional “rights” to Health Care, a “Living Wage” and other items can only be given by taking from others. A free people, on the other hand, will be able to negotiate these items among themselves as equals who recognize that they are each needed for the mutual benefit of everyone involved. The only way that the government can enforce its laws is through force. All other methods proposed are simply illusions to hide that force.
 
5.    I believe in a strong National Defense because it prevents Oppression by outside forces.

The armed forces of the United States of America are the best in the world. Our all volunteer services are manned by those who are dedicated to their jobs and believe in what they do. They serve all of us by supporting and defending the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Most of them take this oath very seriously. Without those who would voluntarily go into this service, the United States would cease to be the free country that it is. For that matter, so would much of the rest of the world.

6.    I believe in lower taxes because high taxes mean Slavery to the State.

The government does not produce. It only redistributes. In order to do this, it must take from some in order to give to others. When the government does so through the use of excessive or progressive tax rates it is seeking to force one person to work for the benefit of another. In any other situation this would be illegal, but we allow our government to do it “for the good of society.” WE are society. The people who this benefits are the political class. In order to truly allow people to be free the collection of funds for the operation of the government would be voluntary, or nearly so. This is why I am a fan of the FairTax ©.
7.    I believe in the Free Market.
The Free Market, unfettered by government interference has the ability to raise the lifestyles of everyone in the community. It is one of the greatest inventions of the human mind, and yet it is as natural as carbon dioxide. Whenever people get together, someone will have something that someone else wants. Through the Free Market, they are able to negotiate the exchange in a manner and for a means that benefits both. The Free Market is largely self correcting. If one business is doing something that harms others, then they will rather quickly lose business. (Think of the Taco Bell meat scare of a few years ago.)
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (13) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You are ALL wrong!


Yes, I’ll be glad to tell you why and how! Everyone is focused on What Went Wrong, What Should We Have Done Differently, Who’s Fault Is It, How Do We Fix It? And Everyone has the wrong answer.

There has been much snarling and gnashing of teeth over McCain, Palin, RINO’s, Obama, etc. The fact of the matter is that we Republicans put up a poor candidate, who wasn’t much different from the other guy, who did nothing to advance Conservatism, and who deserved to lose. Now it’s time to move on. So how do we do it?

The answer does not lie just in short term solutions of demonizing the liberal opposition, looking for a person to lead in 2010 or 2012, or, God forbid, trying to out liberal the liberals, again.

The answer does not lie just in long term solutions of trying to infiltrate the media, taking back the education institutions, or, God forbid, trying to appeal to moderates, again.

The answer does not lie just in focusing on single issues such as abortion, gun control, tax policy, or, God forbid, global warming and carbon credits, again.

The answer lies in the message. It is time for Conservatives to get back to Why Conservatism is Right. It is time for Conservatives to get back to the message of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. It is time for Conservatives to go Positive on their a$se$.

Conservatism is Right. Conservatism is about letting the Individual be free to grow, to screw up, and to learn from his many, many mistakes and shortcomings. Conservatism is about Liberty over government intervention, about Freedom over slavery to the state, about Responsibility over welfare.

It is time to show how it is our IDEAS that will lead. It is time to expound on our core values. Those same values that created this nation, and let her in 200 short years to be the greatest nation on the earth!

Toward that end, I will soon start back, and will begin posting my next series on “Why I’m an Unapologetic Conservative.” Because it is time for us to explain why Conservatism is Right. We must stop being on the defensive. We must stop being focused on single issues that we cannot agree upon, even within our own party. We must begin building, again, and start at the bottom. We must explain the philosophy behind our thinking, because we’ve lost that, and as a result, America has lost.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (30) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

His Own Words...


I was perusing the Presidential Campaign websites recently and came across the following information. All quotes were taken directly from the candidates own information proudly posted on his site. Only the name has been removed to protect the guilty. Free one year
C.A.S.H. membership to anyone who can correctly identify whose website they were taken from.
 

[He] says he wants to restore U.S. standing abroad with an approach to foreign policy that breaks with George W. Bush's "cowboy diplomacy"…

On the Environment:

[He] will issue a Clean Car Challenge to the automakers of America, in the form of a single and substantial tax credit for the consumer based on the reduction of carbon emissions.
 
[He] believes that the penalties for not following [CAFE] standards must be effective enough to compel all carmakers to produce fuel-efficient vehicles.
 
[He] Will Commit $2 Billion Annually To Advancing Clean Coal Technologies.
 
[He] Will Make Greening The Federal Government A Priority Of His Administration.
 
He will work with our international partners to secure our energy future, to create opportunities for American industry, and to leave a better future for our children.
 

Greenhouse Gas Emission Targets And Timetables

2012: Return Emissions To 2005 Levels (18 Percent Above 1990 Levels)

2020: Return Emissions To 1990 Levels (15 Percent Below 2005 Levels)

2030: 22 Percent Below 1990 Levels (34 Percent Below 2005 Levels)

2050: 60 Percent Below 1990 Levels (66 Percent Below 2005 Levels)


[He] Believes That There Must Be A Global Solution To Global Climate Change. [He] will engage the international community in a coordinated effort…
 
He said the United States under his administration would join international efforts to achieve a new agreement in Copenhagen next year on curbing greenhouse gas emissions.
 

[He] said Tuesday the United States will provide global leadership in the fight against climate change if he wins the November election.

On Health Care:

Health care should be available to all and not limited by where you work or how much you make.
 
[He] Will Work With States To Establish A Guaranteed [Health Care] Access Plan.
 
We should dedicate more federal research to caring and curing chronic disease.
 

Government should promote greater access [to Health Care] through walk-in clinics in retail outlets.

On National Service:

Bolster volunteerism with an energetic and comprehensive national service initiative designed to increase opportunities for people willing to serve their communities and their country.
 
Convene "Volunteerism Summits" so people can share with others the best ideas and most effective programs currently underway in their own communities.
 
Boost opportunities for service overseas to increase understanding and communication among diverse cultures.
 

Engage more college students in community service through the Federal Work-Study program; current law requires only seven percent of recipients to perform community service.

On Technology:

[He] will fully fund the America Competes Act to help address these trends in education and training. Our nation’s education system should also help re-train displaced workers. Invigorating our community college system is a good place to start. [He] has long supported grants for educational instruction in digital and wireless technologies, targeted to minorities and low-income students who may not otherwise be exposed to these fields.
 
[He] has always believed the government’s role must be rooted in protecting consumers.
 
[He] Will Pursue High-Speed Internet Access For All Americans.
 
[He] would seek to accurately identify un-served or under-served areas where the market is not working and provide companies willing to build the infrastructure to serve these areas with high speed internet services incentives to do so.
 
[He] Would Support The Federal Government As An Innovator.
 
[He] Would Make Sure that All Citizens Can Participate In The Technology Revolution.
 
Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (39) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Snake in the Grass


I have been remiss in my yard cutting duties at the homestead for nearly two weeks and the grass was starting to get a little rough. The lot next door makes my lawn look immaculate by comparison, however, and the guy on the other side is not exactly finicky about the look of his lawn, either.

I started mowing the lawn this weekend when the riding mower made a rather disheartening popping sound and died on me, with a little smoke issuing from the engine. It was a brand new, 5 year old used mower that my wife got for me for my birthday at the beginning of the summer, too. I think the engine has had it, because when I tried to start it after, it just whined; the engine didn’t as much as cough. So, I pushed it back to the garage and got out the push mower to finish up the job.

While making the first cut around the outside, I saw something moving out of the corner of my eye beside the house. There was a snake slithering along the side of the house! Now, I hate snakes. I am a long confirmed snake-o-phobe. The very sight of them makes me want to crawl inside myself and hide, even though my father would bring them home occasionally when I was a kid and show us how to safely handle them. This one probably came out of the lot next door and couldn’t discern the boundary line between the tall grass in my yard and the taller grass of the lot.

It appears many people are having trouble these days discerning the boundary line between socialism and the Conservative option of a free market economy. We have many snakes within our system of government who are trying to take us ever closer into the weeds of socialism. They hide using different names and different disguises, they take different winding, slithering paths, but the end result is the same.

We have a presidential candidate who is proposing additional government “oversight” for the markets and businesses to ensure that bailouts are not necessary and to promote “transparency” within the markets. He proposes more paperwork and red tape for business; expenses that will be passed on to the consumer. This candidate also proposes more “protections” for those that sign loans that they know they shouldn’t be taking on. He proposes, not to end all bailouts, but rather a program so that the bailouts will be “consistent”. The presidential candidate in question also proposes more government spending in order to manipulate the marketplace to promote alternative energy. He will accomplish all of this while reaching across the aisle to the “other” party. This candidate is none other than John McCain.

As for the snake I saw this weekend in my yard:
I killed it. Ran it over with the lawnmower. And if I had not had to get down off of my comfortable riding mower and instead walk behind the push mower, I may not ever have seen this snake in the first place. I’ve got kids that like to run all through the yard, often barefooted or in flip-flops, and they certainly don’t slow down to see where they’re stepping. They are too young to tell the difference between poisonous and non-poisonous. I don’t want anything to harm my kids. Don’t talk to me about snakes being good and killing the rodents that may be wondering around, either. As a Conservative I can do my own rat killing without appointing a snake proxy to do it for me. And if a bigger snake comes in the yard next time, I will be on the lookout and ready for it.

As for McCain: take a step off the comfort of partisan politics, our party vs. their party, get your hands dirty and stand up for Conservatism. It means sweating a little, but in the end you can help to stop our kids from getting bitten by any of the liberal snakes.
 
Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (13) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I’m a Redheaded Stepchild


I’ve tried to stay away from the Presidential election to this point. Other than being a member of the “Saint Crispin's Day Society” over at the Orphanage, and posting a few stabs here and there about the Republican everyone loves to hate (which can more easily be attributed to my red haired orneriness and willingness to pick a fight (I’m a victim of my nature!)), I have stayed somewhat out of the fray, and have been available for arguments from the other side. Until now. I have not changed my position on McCain. You can now officially count me out of the Maverick camp.

This has not been an easy decision for me.  As a few of you may know, I work as a civilian contractor on a military base.  If McCain loses, then this will most likely mean an Obama win.  As such, military spending is likely to be one of the first cuts of an Obamanation administration. This may mean a job loss for me. I’ve done my part to cultivate skills that should make me employable in other industries, however. The good news is that I won’t have to worry about health care for my kids!
 
We all know various reasons to oppose McCain:
McCain – Feingold
McCain – Lieberman
McCain – Kennedy
McCain - Lautenberg
Cap and Trade
Amnesty for Illegals
Gang of 14
Democrats appointed to Cabinet posts
And many, many others if you needed more.

Then just this week we have information on the Pinko Nancy’s energy bill, her investment conflicts, as well as the “bail-out” and government take-over of yet another segment of our economy. Where is McCain on any of this? Where is his Maverick style outrage over the ethical lapses represented by these events? As the de-factor leader of the party now with the biggest pulpit, this is a big chance for McCain to really stand up and be heard on this issue. He has a real opportunity to lead the party on drilling, as well as to embrace what it really means to be a "maverick" and speak out on the corruption within the Pelosi wing that Gray Ghost highlighted.

Silence…

Bottom line is that McCain is a liberal. Most of us know that. We’ve cussed him in the past for that. Yet many have hope that he’ll somehow change his stripes and “reach across” to Conservatives for a change, instead of giving Conservatives the ol’ “reach around”. With McCain the liberals will get all of their pet legislation, along with a scapegoat when things go wrong. 

If you don’t know my stance on liberalism and socialism, you can take a look here. I’ve said before that liberalism is a far greater threat to this nation than the Islamofascists and been met with stares. There are several reasons.

We can fight the Islamofascits. (No, it’s not a typo.) We know who they are. We know what they want. They have told us, and they continue to warn us of their intentions. And when they attack we know it and We, as a Nation, get very upset and fight back. 

The liberals hide themselves. They hide behind our children. They hide behind our parents. They hide behind the sick, the poor, and the defenseless. They undermine our society slowly. They weaken our military, our economy, our national pride, our morality. They don’t quit and they are always gaining ground.

I’d rather have an enemy in front of me that I can see and fight fairly than one that could be anywhere, one that may even be waiting for me when I get home.  As a former Navy Bubblehead I can appreciate and understand the tactics.  I also know that I don't want to fight against them.  We need to force them into the open.

Once we defeat liberalism, then the Islamofascits are easy. They cannot scare a nation that is determined to take care of itself. They cannot defeat people who stand up for themselves.

If we lose to liberalism than we’ve also lost to the Islamofascits. They will be able to walk right in the front door and take our houses, our schools, our churches.

Finally, to quote someone far older than I:
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious.  But it cannot survive treason from within.  An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.  But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.  For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.  He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.  A murder is less to fear."
-       Cicero

Under Obama, the Islamofascits may get nukes.
Under McCain, the liberals get a Nation.

I'll be voting for Barr this year, and I'll be doing it with a clear conscience.  Can the rest of you say the same?

I’m now officially a Redheaded Step-child within my own party.
Let the beatings begin.

Note:
This original post was written rather quickly, so I’ve updated it somewhat to better reflect my normal style. I didn’t want to give the impression that I may have been body snatched by the “Brianistas” (and wouldn’t the ladies have been jealous of the Brianistas then!) and forced to publish this against my will.

This also officially splits the Crimson Apex TownHallers, with Boaz being, as far as I know, the only remaining member not to yet take a stand (Frigglesnitz has been a no-show at the meetings lately).
 
Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (41) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberal Logic


Well, the series on Liberal Logic is complete, at least for now. It has been a huge success, receiving at least two visitors per post. As originally posted, the liberal mindset is full of flawed thinking and contradictory views. For a group that claims to value scientific thinking over religion, they really rely on faith to support their positions. But of course, it’s not really about any of these issues. It’s about Control.
 
The original series was to be seven posts, but grew into ten. Again, this confirms my Engineer’s OCD. So, if you missed any of them, they are linked below, along with the Redhead or Redneck counterpart to the post, or you can click here to see the whole series in reverse order. I do use a lot of links in my articles, and these are meant to provide reference material or just amuse, so feel free to click through. I would recommend sending your liberal friends over to see why their thinking is flawed, but getting a liberal to understand logic is like getting a giraffe to pilot a wind-powered airplane.
 

1:       Evolution vs. Climate Change:

Liberals love to present themselves as embracing evolution and being enlightened vs. us “Religious Zealots” who hold to the flat earth.  Yet they try to keep the earth’s climate stagnant and prevent the whole system from changing and the organisms on it from evolving.
 

Redneck Recycling:

Whenever I speak out against the liberal view of global warming, it seems that I get accused of being some illiterate redneck. Well, for your information, sir, rednecks have been protecting the environment and recycling stuff before it was hip, and still you look down on us. So I felt the need to provide you with a few examples.
 

2:       Big Government vs. Big Business:

Liberals seem to embrace larger and larger government, yet rail on and on against big business.  The very thought that government is always benevolent is in itself a symptom of defective thinking, but I plan to look at it from a logical standpoint and the differences between the two.

There are three main differences between Big Business and Big Government:
 

1.    Businesses cannot place you in jail for refusing to buy their goods or services, or in any other way force you to give them YOUR money.

2.    Businesses cannot charge you for services they perform only for your neighbor.

3.    If businesses try to accomplish 1 or 2, you can pursue them in court.
 

3:       Capitalism vs. Democracy:

Why is it that so many “Democrats” hate Capitalism, when Capitalism and Democracy are nearly one and the same?  Capitalism, in its purest form, is Democracy, every minute of every day, using money to cast votes.  A business (politician) that does not offer the consumer (voter) something that they want will not get their money (votes).  So why is it that liberals, who identify with the Democrat Party, are afraid of this?  Could it be that they are actually afraid of the voters?
 

Redneck Business:

Rednecks love private business.  Except for the 90’s, Rednecks were poorly represented by the government.  We also have a poor record when it comes to interacting with government agencies.
 

4:       Evolution vs. Animal Protection:

This is similar 1 above, but here I hope to explore the incessant need to push those dying whales back into the ocean rather than chop them up for food, or to save the Flat-spired three-toothed Snail, in view of evolution.
 
Animals evolve through natural selection to ensure species survival.  This often occurs due to changes in the environment.  This can involve human or natural intervention.  Yet when humans intervene to encourage evolution, the animal rights crowd goes nuts!
 

5:       Gun Control vs. Government Protection:

So many liberals want to get weapons out of the hands of the people and leave us to rely on government (police) protection, yet they complain about police cruelty and the inadequacies of FEMA.

Without guns, We the People, have the potential of becoming victims of government abuses and excesses.  This is the very reason behind the 2nd Amendment.  But if the people were disarmed, it would make it much easier for The Party to collect taxes from the evil rich?
 

Redneck Gun Control:

Tips for good gun control from people that know.
 

6:       Feminism vs. the Sexual Revolution:

Feminism used to be based on the fact that men and women are created equal.  Somehow this went hand in hand with the sexual revolution where women are taken advantage of solely for their bodies, and not for their minds.  Have you ever met a male “enlightened liberal” who wasn’t also a womanizer (or gay)?

 

7:       Diversity vs. …Everything:

Too many that espouse “diversity” often also espouse policies that actually reduce diversity.  I’m talking about diversity of thought, diversity of opinion, diversity of actions.  The liberal position seems to be that people are too stupid to do anything for themselves, or make their own decisions, so we are going to mandate these things that we think are good for you.  Seatbelts – no dissension allowed.  Smoking – no dissension allowed.  Guns – no dissension allowed. And these are their good points.

Seeing as there is a lot of money to be made in promoting diversity, the Crimson Apex Solidarity Horde is going into full swing.

8:       Money vs. Money:

We have learned from many on the left over the years that, “It’s not about the money.  You can be rich in so many other ways!”  Yet, at the same time, they make constant calls for more money for this, that, and the other, usually to be paid by “The Rich.”

“Money doesn’t buy happiness.”  This is what we’re told by feel good liberals when talking about the accomplishments of some business leader.  If that is the case, then why do they feel the need to expand the welfare rolls?  These people may already be rich in love.  Why do they always demean those who have made it big time for themselves, and for their kids?  Why is it that they want to take their hard earned money, if it’s not important?

Those of the Crimson Cranium cabal love money.  As such, the Crimson Apex Solidarity Horde is proud to announce their latest program: the Scarlet Collection of Assets Mechanism.

9:       Religion vs. The State:

We have heard for many years now about the “Separation of Church and State.”  We have also heard that “You cannot legislate morality!”  Yet many government programs, from Welfare to Social Security, from Nationalized Health Care to Carbon Credits rely on an appeal to our morality and our often are justified on religious grounds. It seems that liberals are fine using religion to get what they want, but reluctant to turn to it to receive what they need.

In some parts of the country you can be blasted as bitter for clinging to religion, but in redneck country it can mark you as someone who doesn’t hunt and isn’t too lazy to get up on Sunday.

10:     The Individual vs. The Collective:

Liberals love to place people in neat little groups, such as Christian Conservatives, Gays, Blacks, Women, and so forth.  This alignment of people provides them with neat little categories to lump people into while they can ignore the individuals that make up the groups.  The Individual is an anathema to those who worship the Collective.


Next up on the plate here at R&R: “Why I’m an Unapologetic Conservative”, another multi-part series.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming Update


Global warming update:


Could Global Warming have prevented these tragic deaths?

Help advance Global Warming. Invest in
Carbon Resets today.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Redhead Money


This is a companion piece to the
Money vs. Money portion of Liberal Logic.

Those of the Crimson Cranium cabal love money. As such, the Crimson Apex Solidarity Horde is proud to announce their latest program: the Scarlet Collection of Assets Mechanism.

The S.C.A.M. program will henceforth be set up to collect funds from our dark- and light-haired oppressors. As of the current embodiment of this program, C.A.S.H. members will not be required to contribute. This is subject to change, however, depending on administrative costs and other factors.

Proceeds from S.C.A.M will initially go towards education efforts to highlight the plight of the Red Headed Human. Such education programs will highlight such tribulations as public harassment due to spotted pigmentation, the effects of the sun on those of the extreme fair skinned, red haired persuasion, and the potential emotional harm that can happen from handling our hair without our go-ahead, or conspicuous constant colloquial requests to confirm the colossal keenness for coupling.

After education efforts get underway, it is hoped that the S.C.A.M. program will also serve to enrich the lives of those Ginger groups who have been especially harmed through discrimination, harassment, and bigotry. Most prominent among these groups are the members of the Crimson Apex Town Hall’ers (CATHeters (Because we’ll take the fight straight to your pee-hole!)) as noted on the sidebar to the right.

It should be noted that the S.C.A.M. program is currently a voluntary program. This is subject to change as well, and will be evaluated periodically based on the number of donations received, the convenience of corporate cash and the quantity of Crimson Cranium corporate cronies at each location, as well as an assessment to ensure a large percentage of the CATHeter members blogs appear on other Town Hall blogrolls.

C.A.S.H. also reserves the right to evaluate the need for Red Head Reparations based on the success of the S.C.A.M. program.

On a side note:

It appears after preliminary analysis that the newly named Vice Presidential nominee for the Republican Party has Red Hair, and therefore gets the endorsement of C.A.S.H. It’s just a shame that we cannot just get a VP without having to take a P!

C.A.S.H.: Because Red is more than just a State of Mind; Red is Right!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Biden Opening

Ok, so B.O. named Joe Biden for his Vice Presidential running mate this last week. Much has already been written on the various gaffs and misstatements made by Biden, and on what he has said in praise of McCain and to disparage B.O. But I have a different take on the Biden pick. You knew that I would!

He had a chance to pick someone who really stood up for everyone, someone who could point to his background and say that he could “feel your pain,” the great B.O. picks Joe Biden.

Joe Biden is proud of his former slave state of Delaware, saying that they would have joined the Confederacy, if only they could have figured “out how to get to the South.” Joe Biden has referred to B.O. as “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.” As opposed to the other kind, eh Joe? Perhaps Joe Biden has been hanging around the other Democrat leader proud of his white history, Robert “KKK” Byrd. It’s the Bobby Joe twins! Uncle Joe Biden’s attitude apparently goes for others who are non-white, as well. He was the one who proposed dividing up Iraq into racial groups as a solution to their problems. “Separate but Equal,” Joe?

Perhaps the reason that B.O. is open to this kind of thing is because he feels the same way. It won’t be the first time that some “uppity” black man has been accused of “speaking down to black people.”

Barack's primary role model, his father, was a black man and, as the song says, "[His] daddy gave [him] a name, then he walked away."  Leaving young Barry "a scared [black] boy in a [white] neighborhood."  Perhaps this bitterness toward his father for leaving him and his mother accounts for his Cosby moment in which he beseeched black men to stand up for their families.  His half sister, a white-asian, figures prominently in his campaign, while his half brother, a black African, sits in a hut and lives on a dollar a month.

Barack was also raised for many of his formative years by an old racist white woman who feared black men who passed by her on the street. How much of this did he absorb? As a youth, Obama spent much of his time surrounded by people who were not black. How much of their Typical White Racism did he pick up? He couldn’t identify with black people. The most that he knew about them was what he had been told by his white friends and family.

He went to Harvard in the late 1980’s, in that bastion of white-itude, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Not a place known at the time for their high black attendance rates. If he had time to see any “real” blacks there, I’m sure he didn’t spend much time associating with them in between studies and editing the paper. In fact, he says that it wasn’t until Chicago that, “I discovered I was black, and I have remained so ever since.”

He apparently went to a church that preached “Liberation Theology” in Chicago, but never seems to have gone to church to hear a sermon. Did he know, at all, what his pastor was saying in the pulpit? Maybe if he did, he would have left much sooner. After all, Reverend Wright’s views do not reflect his.

Meanwhile, even Michelle Obama’s hospital turns away minorities from the surrounding neighborhoods.

Many of Obama’s policies also reflect his hatred toward blacks. He supports “Immigrant Rights,” which affect the working poor and the black communities the most. He opposes school vouchers, which have been shown to benefit blacks stuck in failing inner city schools. He supports abortion and the Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood, which has been shown to disproportionally kill off black babies.

So my question for Mr. Barack Hussein Obama is this:

Why do you hate black people? Why do you take them for granted? Why do you talk down to them so often? Why do you celebrate the endorsement of Robert Byrd? Why did you choose one of the whitest running mates you could find? Do you agree with his racist views about black people?
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (23) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Individual vs. The Collective


This is part ten, and the final chapter (here, at least), in the ongoing saga of Liberal Logic. You can find the other parts
here.

Liberals love to place people in neat little groups, such as Christian Conservatives, Gays, Blacks, Women, and so forth. This alignment of people provides them with neat little categories to lump people into while they can ignore the individuals that make up the groups. The Individual is an anathema to those who worship the Collective. If you don’t believe that liberals are at war with the idea of Individualism, go here.

(Author’s note: Yes, I know that I am also grouping Liberals into a neat little group in this essay. If you are a Liberal or Progressyve and this does not apply to you, please accept my apologies. As I said in my original post, in this series I will make many generalities, so don’t bore me with cries of “Not me!”  Don’t worry; I’ll get to you another time.)

The left hates those Individuals who refuse to fall into one of their groups. This is why they detest those like Clarence Thomas, Michelle Malkin, Condoleezza Rice, and others who refuse to join them on their plantation. It is worthy of note that those that belong to one of the many “Minority Groups” (as determined by them) that come out for Conservatism are the ones that are most hated. They have ruined their method of categorizing people, and have shown that there really are Individuals out there who refuse to be categorized! If you belong to a protected minority class and intend to go against the liberal agenda, be forewarned that you may be headed down a short road.

They support their favorite programs, such as “Climate Change” based on consensus science. They denigrate those who refuse to give in to their collective view as ignorant rednecks and worse. They conveniently ignore those that have fostered scientific revolutions through their own work, such as Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla, and possibly Garrett Lisi. They promote the Appeal to Authority argument by listing other collectivist organizations which leads to the question, “If those people jumped off a bridge, would you?”

By collecting these people into groups, and then promising each group their own version of a chicken for their pot, they try to collect a grand coalition to overcome the natural American Spirit of Individualism, Self Reliance, and Liberty.

The placement of people into groups also serves the Sun Tzu technique of Divide and Conquer. From “
The Art of War” Chapter VI, Weak Points and Strong:

12. If we do not wish to fight, we can prevent the enemy from engaging us even though the lines of our encampment be merely traced out on the ground.  All we need do is to throw something odd and unaccountable in his way.

13. By discovering the enemy's dispositions and remaining invisible ourselves, we can keep our forces concentrated, while the enemy's must be divided.

14. We can form a single united body, while the enemy must split up into fractions.  Hence there will be a whole pitted against separate parts of a whole, which means that we shall be many to the enemy's few.
 
By dividing the people of this Great Country they can conquer the political climate and get their agenda pushed forward.

As Conservatives, we understand that the population of any group is made up of Individuals. When a madman went on a rampage in a church, we condemn the Individual. The liberal condemns the group he supposedly belongs to.

Where the liberal elevation of the Collective falls apart is in the elevation of their political leaders. When B. J. Clinton committed perjury and lied to the American people, the left covered for him like cheese on hash browns. When people who get paid to lie for a living utter political commentary, the left treats it like the gospel. And when a tall guy with black hair that earns six figures as a lawyer who is married to a lawyer and went to an Ivy League school with slave holding ancestors who claims to be a Christian runs for President of the United States, the left gets shivers down their legs and faint at every appearance.

The left also hates the Individual because the Individual represents everything that they despise. The Individual may make choices that liberals disagree with, or that are not for the common good. The Individual must not have the right to defend his self. The Individual must not be able to make choices about what products to buy and sell. The Individual must not be able to decide who is going to receive his charitable donations. The Individual must not be able to place himself above others.

So remember, You are unique, You are good enough, You are smart enough, and doggone it, people like You.

So why do they place everyone into neat little groups? Why are many of their most powerful arguments simply appeals to authority?  Why do they hate the Individual? Why do they profess to sacrifice the one for the many? The answer, my friends, is simple:

It’s not about you, me, or even us, it’s about Control.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (18) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »