About Me

Name:Redhead
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

The Left on Rights


So, now that it has been confirmed that the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is an individual right, what is the left to do?

The left is very fond of “rights.” You have a right to a living wage, a right to adequate housing, a right to get married, a right to adequate food, a right to health care. In each of these rights put forth by the left, their answer to support these rights is usually to enact social programs to ensure that everyone has access to these “rights.” In many cases they will champion for property to be taken from some so that others have access to these rights.

So, will they now advocate for measures to ensure that everyone has access to a weapon? After all, as a right of this country, shouldn’t everyone be entitled to such?

I would like to propose a new program:

The Gun Ownership Training and Certified Handling for America Program.

60% of all US homes are without a gun. This leaves nearly 180,000,000 people without access to a firearm for self defense. Clearly, some action needs to be taken. It would only seem right that the Federal Government should step in and ensure that every person has access to a firearm. Toward this end, The Gun Ownership Training and Certified Handling for America (GOTCHA) Program will ensure that every American has access to a firearm and qualified training.

If a person can show that they cannot afford training and a weapon, then it will be provided for them. This could take the form of requiring employers to provide training, and a tax deduction for those that also elect to provide their employees with a weapon. The weapon should be a minimum of a six round 9mm handgun, although rifles with fewer rounds may qualify, depending on the size of the ammunition. Shotguns do not qualify. A minimum of 100 rounds of ammunition for the qualifying weapon must also be provided.

If a person is unemployed, then a suitable weapon will be provided at no charge from the government. Social Services Departments will be enlisted to ensure training and dissemination of weapons. You may apply at the same time and location as applying for unemployment or other social welfare benefits.

In conjunction with this program, the federal government will be enlisted to ensure that firearms are affordable to every American. As such, firearms manufacturers and distributors will first be exempt from all lawsuits resulting from the mishandling of their products. They will also be required to submit to periodic screening to ensure that they are not indulging in pricing practices that result in windfall profits that may follow an emergency situation such as a natural disaster or organized attack on the citizens of this great country.

All facilities which receive federal funds will be required to have at least one trained and armed person per 100 persons at the facility. Each separate building on a campus or other multi-structure facility will be required to have at least one such trained and armed person per structure.

Firearm training programs will be provided by federally funded colleges and universities. It is also proposed that firearm training be a mandatory part of the college curriculum. In this way, America will ensure that a large segment of its population that may not otherwise receive adequate training will have access to this valuable tool.

It is hoped that the GOTCHA Program will result in the ability of the citizens of America to adequately protect themselves and their property from attack. This should also ensure that the right of Americans to adequate protection is guaranteed.
 
Tags: Gun Control  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (24) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama’s Obstacles


We are told that Republicans will not vote for Obama because he’s black, and Obama himself has suggested that the GOP will use race based ads to scare white people. If we don’t vote for Obama then we’re racist!  So, I thought I would break down a few other demographics to explain some other reasons not to vote for Mr. Barrack Obama. If you’re really interested in all that socialist policy stuff that really matters, I suggest you turn here, here, here, here, here… oh, just go here; Crawfish has it all broken down over at the Swamp. If you want to focus on demographics and race and gender and income like most good little socialists, then you’re in the right place.

On race itself, it seems as though it is the Obama people that are bringing it up more than others, so I thought I’d grant them one, but let’s look at the numbers, shall we?

If you grant that Obama is black, then he is not a minority in his home town of Chicago. In fact, Chicago is nearly 37% black, the largest racial demographic in that city. Being black also means that he is less of a minority than Indians, Asians, Pacific Islanders, or the Community of Crimson Craniums.

If you grant Obama’s white lineage, then it is clear that he is not a minority in the US, and he even qualifies as a member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.

On the other big topic of Religion, Obama also seems to have a dual heritage, but does this qualify him as disadvantaged? Is he a minority? Well, if he is a Christian, then he falls within 75% of the U.S. population who also claim to be Christians. If he is Muslim, then he falls within over 1 billion people worldwide who also identify themselves as Muslim. Neither seems to qualify him for minority status.

Ok, so on the biggies he’s not much of a minority, so voting for or against him for these reasons is a bit silly. But maybe he’s disadvantaged in some other way? Let’s take a look…

Obama went to a private school in Hawaii, the Puahou School. Tuition there currently is nearly $16,000 / year. Not many disadvantages. He then went on to go to Harvard Law School. Graduation from there is virtually guaranteed to get you a top dollar job.

Obama is a lawyer, married to a lawyer. As a U.S. Senator he brings home $169,300 annually (before taxes). In 2007, Obama and his wife filled taxes on $991,296, down from over $1.6 million the year before! This places him easily into the top 1% of wage earners in this country.

Well, I have yet to see where Obama has been disadvantaged much in any way. So let’s go down a little deeper, and even more superficially.

Obama is a guy. A guy who women swoon for, according to reports. This means that he has not experienced the kind of sexism like others we have heard about.

Obama has black hair. Not having Red Hair of course means right away that he doesn’t qualify for C.A.S.H. In fact, Black hair is the most common of human hair color.

Obama is tall. Six foot one, according to some reports. This puts him in an advantaged group, according to some reports. Many believe that tall people are better than us short people. Even his wife is taller than average, which leads some to question whether height will be a factor in this year’s election. (Let’s hope not…)

So, I am having a little trouble figuring out where this claim of being disadvantaged in some way comes from. I cannot figure out what all the fuss is about. Am I missing something? Is having a tall guy with black hair that earns six figures as a lawyer and went to an Ivy League school with slave holding ancestors who claims to be a Christian running for President of the United States of America something new?
 
Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (25) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Carbon Credit Crisis


I was trying to get ahead of this Carbon Credit thing before the bill died, but I had a few questions that needed answering before I really felt comfortable getting in too deep. So I called by Carbon Credit Broker, Mr. Donkeythumper. I think he’s part American Indian.

He agreed to set up a meeting at the local Starbucks the next day. I’m not a big Starbucks fan, but I agree to the location anyway, because Donkeythumper says it’s convenient for him. He also lets me know that he hates being called “Mister.” He says he doesn’t want to become part of that whole corporate vibe.

So I get there a little early the next day and order myself a cup of coffee; “Regular, Regular, Black, Regular.” “One Joe Shmoe!” The barista hollers to the back. After serving me, Donkeythumper takes off his apron and sits down with me at the table.

“What’s up, dude?” He begins.  He's very informal, but I was referred to him by my brother, Karl.

“Well, I’ve got a few questions about Carbon Credits and taxes.” I say. “I’m a little confused, what with the new Cap and Trade, and windfall profits taxes, and so forth.”

“Yeah, that stuff’s deep, man. But they’ll get it all figured out, then we can all get on board and live the righteous life. Those are some smart dudes up there in Wash’, you know? So lay it on me, man.”

“Well, if I buy a lot of Credits, and then sell them after some catastrophe at a profit, will I be subject to a windfall profits tax?”

Donkeythumper assures me he’ll look into this.

“What if I’ve got these Credits stored in my garage, or in my shed out back, and the house catches fire, will they be covered under my home insurance? Will I have to buy additional Carbon Credits to pay off the carbon debit I’ve incurred during the fire?”

Donkeythumper shakes his head. His dreadlocks nearly knock over my coffee. He offers to sell me some Carbon Credit Insurance that will cover me in case of a loss. He says it’s very reasonable.

“What if I need to sell my Carbon Credits later this year? Will I be subject to Capital Gains taxes? How long should I hold onto them?”

Donkeythumper abruptly gets up. He tells me his break is almost over, and he needs to go out back and take his meds, although he does invite me out to share. Apparently this vibrant young man has glaucoma! Just goes to show, you can’t tell what kind of crisis someone may be having just by looking at them.

Well, it’s been almost a week, and even though I bought nearly a million tons worth of Carbon Credits from Donkeythumper, I have yet to hear back from him. His mom says he and his best buddy left out for California the next day, for a Carbon Credit Conference, I’m sure. His phone must not work very well out there, because whenever I call, all I hear are screams and “Yes, Yes, Yes,” no matter what I ask him.

So, what should I do? Can anyone help me with my questions? I may need to get another broker.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (22) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CASH Victory!


President Bush signed the Genetic Nondiscrimination Information Act into law on May 21, 2008. (An early birthday present for your humble founder.) With this law, the Crimson Apex Solidarity Horde (CASH) claims an important victory in the quest for equal treatment of the (2nd) smallest minority in the US – the Redhead! (For those of you wondering, “The smallest minority on earth is the individual.”  – A.R.)

GINA (Genetic Nondiscrimination Information Act) prevents insurance companies and businesses from discriminating against individuals based on their genetic makeup. This discrimination may take the form of increased insurance premiums, loss of insurance coverage, loss of job opportunities in the workplace, or loss of wages.

For those of us with Red Hair, this means that we can no longer be denied our place at the Head of the table just because we have a Red Head. So apply for that job, seek that promotion, and rise to the top, because you deserve it, and can not be denied it just because someone thinks you have a carrot top! If they try to stop you, sue the pants off them!

But there is still much to be done. Keep those contributions coming! Only with your help can we hope to achieve more equality for the Crimson Craniums of this world!

Because GINA only forbids businesses from requesting or demanding a genetic test for hiring or promotional purposes, it may not stop the full discrimination that we Crimson Craniums feel. After all, we wear our genetic makeup on our heads! Is a test really necessary to determine that a job applicant has Red Hair and Freckles? It is for this reason that C.A.S.H. will keep fighting for you, our Burgundy Brothers! C.A.S.H. has determined that this law does not go far enough! We will fight for your right to sit out the job interview. That’s right; you shouldn’t even have to show up, because unless the interviewer is blind, they will be able to determine your genetic makeup visually, putting you at an instant disadvantage from your dark haired oppressors. So stay home, don’t go to the next job interview; and if they still don’t hire you, C.A.S.H. has your back like a White House Press Secretary!

We must also beware of legislation such as this, and you can be sure that the team over here at C.A.S.H. RedHeadQuarters is going through it piece by piece. We will insure that there are not some other nefarious items stuck in here, like requiring everyone to submit to genetic testing for the government.

Next stop: Hate Speech! The next time someone offends you with a “Ginger” joke, or a comment about how hot in bed RedHeads are (it may be true, but I still find it highly offensive!), take them to court! Soon we’ll have this First Amendment thing beat, too!


C.A.S.H.: Because Red is more than just a State of Mind; Red is Right!
 
Tags: law   Redheads  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Problem with Liberals


Well, this one’s easy.

Liberals are dishonest, unhappy, they wish to destroy our capitalist economy, they support our enemies, they want to control our lives, and kill God.


Have a nice day!
 
Tags: Liberals  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (19) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Problem with Conservatives


I was reading through some thread here on
Townhall the other day, and some liberal twit was telling us poor, stupid conservatives that we may as well give it up, because liberalism always wins. The point they were trying to make was that throughout history, the country has become more and more liberal, and that the fate of the Republic was a given, and we don’t stand a chance.

This got me thinking, and when that happens, I feel so proud of it, I simply must let everyone else know about it, so here it is.

To a degree they were right. (Maybe I’ll think more about that “to a degree” part later, and alert everyone to my findings then…) The question then becomes, Why? It is a problem that I actually noted some time ago. There is a problem with conservatives getting their voices out to the people, and to the politicians. I think I know a couple of major sources of this problem.

The first problem with conservatives is: We are too individualistic. Our very philosophy makes it difficult for us to congregate in groups, to send mass e-mails to our representatives, and to take group action against others.

It is difficult to get conservatives to participate in marches, rallies, or protests. You will rarely see a collection of conservatives like this. For one thing, we are trying to lead productive lives, and tend to our jobs, our families, and our friends. In short, we’re too busy. Many conservatives have already put time in the military, and feel as if they have already “given at the office.” For another, we have too much sense to go out of the house dressed like this. We also recognize these protests for what they are: a bunch of bored children with nothing better to do, screaming for their nannies.

Most of us believe in the individual to such an extent that when the time comes for action, we do it on our own. Occasionally, this coincides with a lot of other people participating in the same cause, but often, there are only one or two loners who take action, while the rest of us sit back and cheer them on from our armchairs, and maybe donate a few dollars to the cause. Then, when they are defeated, we forget about the whole thing. After all, we didn’t have a dog in the hunt.

When conservatives have tried to come together in some meaningful way it is a hit-or-miss type of experiment, and is often taken over by the fringe elements. A bunch of Ron Paul supporters are congregating in Texas to build their own little community, “off the grid.” A bunch of libertarians got together to move to and take over New Hampshire. Never heard of these projects? Neither have most people. Conservatives aren’t very good at advertising, either. On the other hand, conservatives have successfully brought people together to preserve our rights. Think the Gathering of Eagles, or Tennessee’s Tax Revolt.

I believe that Townhall.com is a good step in the right direction. (Newsmax could have had this distinction, but they never allowed comments, and didn’t take blogging seriously.) In the past, the political internet has been dominated by left wing groups, like those Divisive Ulcers over at Democratic Underground, the Huffy Huddle Pests over at Huffington Post, or the Delusional Kids over at Daily Kos. It was not until Townhall really came into being that we conservatives really had something similar. Sure, there were other news sites, and some blog sites, but I don’t think that anything really took on the tone and the leadership in the sphere like Townhall has.

As such, I would like to provide support for the idea of a Townhall Convention, even if it means having several in different locals, so that it would be easier for people to attend.

The other problem with conservatives is: We believe in the rule of law. This means that when someone does finally stand up for himself, (or herself, if we’re going to keep it politically correct, which I won’t for the rest of this piece. Live with it, gals. You are included in this!) and takes matters into his own hands, we sit back and congratulate the police on doing a good job when they take him down.

Conservatives don’t believe in sit-ins, or blocking the streets in protest. For one, we’re too d@mn polite. For another, we’ve got other things to do, and recognize that other people do, too. We don’t see getting arrested as a badge of honor, or a right of passage for the cause. We see it as the mark of an idiot. It may be time to change this perception.

It may be time for conservatives to start backing the woman who carries her gun into the restaurant, or the guy who refuses to pay his taxes. Perhaps we start small, with a fund set up to pay the fines for these people. Yes, I know there are several groups who will provide defense attorneys for some of these, and each has their little niche. We need a broader one, set up just to pay the fines, so that all can continue on with their productive, conservative lives. If anyone knows of a group already set up this way, please pass it on. This would have the effect of taking away some of the pain of civil disobedience. It may also encourage this type of disobedience. This could be a good thing. It’s about time conservatives were heard.

It’s about time we all stood up and shouted, "I'm mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore!" So who’s going to get all of this started? Who’s going to set up our civil disobedience fund? Who’s going to organize the rallies and marches across Washington and our states’ capitals? Who’s going to set up and find a suitable setting for the Townhall Convention?

Don’t look at me. I’m too busy… I gave at the office… Besides, crowds make me nervous… I’ve got a job and a family to take care of…
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (24) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Help for CASH


The Crimson Apex Solidarity Horde (CASH) needs help coming up with a motto for its organization. We all know that every good rights group has a catchy motto or phrase to get people’s attention and to promote their cause.
 
There’s the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition: “PUSH the little white guy to the back of the bus.”
 
There’s CAIR: “Because 19 bitter, Koran toting, Kaffiyeh wearing, airplane packing terrorists can’t be wrong.”
 
There’s The New Black Panther Party: “Freedom or Death”, “Because this racist nation locks us up and won’t let us speak! Do you know how hard it is to type with shackles on?”
 
There’s the National Council of La Raza: “A Stronger America Together” “without all you white people


So, CASH needs your help to come up with our own catchy motto! Currently, we’re going with “Because the world needs
another special interest victims group.” We are now taking your proposals, however. Proposals will be taken from any direction, but those received by CATHeters will receive priority.  There will be a vote among members only at the next convention.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Money vs. Money


This is part eight of a seven part series on Liberal Logic.  You can see the whole set here.

We have learned from many on the left over the years that, “It’s not about the money. You can be rich in so many other ways!” This attitude can be seen in my brother, Karl. Yet, at the same time, they make constant calls for more money for this, that, and the other, usually to be paid by “The Rich.”

“Money doesn’t buy happiness.” This is what we’re told by feel good liberals when talking about the accomplishments of some business leader. If that is the case, then why do they feel the need to expand the welfare rolls? These people may already be rich in love. Why do they always demean those who have made it big time for themselves, and for their kids? Why is it that they want to take their hard earned money, if it’s not important?

“It’s not about the money” can also explain why liberals ignore the fact that as tax rates have gone down, tax revenues have gone up. Because “it’s not about the money,” liberals are free to advocate tax schemes that will clearly, and have been shown historically, to actually reduce tax revenues. “It’s not about the money,” they say, and they are telling the truth. It’s about social engineering and trying to modify society’s behavior.

Come to think of it, this may also explain why so many liberals are unhappy. Despite all of their tax schemes, they have not yet figured out a way to tax those that are “rich in love.” Don’t worry, though, I’m sure someone is working on it…The Happy Tax. This should make liberals truly happy. This way they can tax people for smiling, laughing, and making fun of them. Of course, they won’t get any real joy out of this. It might make them one of the “evil rich.”

Liberals also love to complain about all of the jobs that seem to get sent overseas during a Republican Presidency. At the same time, they call for an increase in the corporate tax rates, when we already have one of the highest corporate tax rates in the industrial world!

Of course, the dirty little secret that no one will admit is that it is the Democrats that are the party of the dollar! They boast the richest members of congress.  They raise the most money from big dollar donors. Their policies continually benefit big business in opposition to the little guy.

So why do liberals want to take people’s money from them? Why do they tell us that “it’s not about the money,” while complaining about those that have money? Why do they fear capitalism, which creates far more wealthy people than any other system? The answer, my friends, is simple.

It’s not about the Money, it’s about control.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (18) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

C.A.S.H. Position Statement

Due to the recent heated discussions sparked by the latest update from the Crimson Apex Solidarity Horde (CASH), we have felt the need to issue a policy statement to clarify our positions.
 

Red Hair Dye:

It is the position of CASH that Red Hair Dye is a racist product. It is clearly the equivalent of blackface. As a result, people who dye their hair red will be outed as the ginger-phobic racists that they are. We will not be mocked! We are tired of people who try to claim our inherent traits as their own, yet do not possess one ounce of red haired blood!

It has been said that some sixty percent of women who dye their hair do so at home. Of them twenty six percent choose to go blonde, twenty seven percent go basic brunette, and thirty percent choose to become redheads. The sale of at home red dye kits has gone up seventeen percent since the year two thousand hit.

As a result, and in order to raise awareness of this relatively new phenomenon, CASH will be bringing this issue to the attention of Hollywood, since they are always looking for some new cause to champion. CASH will be seeking volunteers to peruse all movies, preferably with some of the bigger stars, to ensure that all rugs match the drapes, so to speak. Any faux reds that are found should be immediately reported to CASH management, along with all supporting documentation and evidence, for inclusion in our official Hollywood lobbying files. These will be reviewed at the next CASH management meeting to ensure that they are up to our high standards.

CASH does not support even the dyeing of ones hair for “research” purposes. We will not condone a replay of the fiasco perpetrated by John Griffin in 1961. Anyone seeking to understand our plight needs only to talk to one of us. We are not diseased. We are not an inherently angry people. We will appreciate the chance to explain our points of view in a human way.


“Strawberry” Blondes:

As previously mentioned, the topic of “strawberry” blondes has been a hotly contested issue within CASH. At our last convention a riot nearly ensued as a direct result of this debate. (Yes, of course we have conventions. Yes, they are usually held in cloudier climates, or indoors.) It is currently the position of CASH that “strawberries” are not representative of the Crimson Apex Solidarity Horde. These posers have not had to suffer the humiliation that many of us have as a direct result of the color of their hair. They often hide behind the dominant blonde coloring of their hair to accomplish their goals, or to make up for their short comings. They will then retreat to “strawberry” when the need arises.

Imagine, if you will, someone who is half black and half white. Imagine if this person was brought up in the finest white neighborhoods, and attended fine private schools usually enjoyed only by whites. Imagine further that this person descended from white slave-owners, and whose relatives fought in the Civil War, for the Confederate Army. Now, imagine if this person then moved to a predominately black town, and joined a predominately black church. Can you imagine the outcry that would happen if this person were to then come onto the national stage in some way, and try to appeal to people, based on his “blackness”? His whole background would be ayer’d! This person would be derided for his audacity. And wrightly so! If this person then disagreed with some national black leadership figure, he would be wrightly accused of grandstanding in front of white people.

It is just this kind of pandering that CASH will not tolerate. We will not condone the minimalization of the Red Haired Experience. It is for this reason that we will not allow these mongrels into our ranks.

On a further note, we will not discriminate against those that are not descended directly from red haired parents. This is clearly taking the issue too far, and we will not take part in this
kind of discrimination. So, if both of your parents happen to have dark hair, or one is red and one is blonde, you are welcome into our ranks, as long as your hair color is clearly crimson.
 
Tags: Redheads  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint I